{"id":1050,"date":"2023-05-10T17:22:47","date_gmt":"2023-05-10T08:22:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bran-design.jp\/en\/?p=1050"},"modified":"2023-05-10T17:50:38","modified_gmt":"2023-05-10T08:50:38","slug":"mario-kart-nintendo-vs-maricar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bran-design.jp\/en\/article\/case\/1050\/","title":{"rendered":"MARIO KART (Nintendo) vs MariCar"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Nintendo won a lawsuit against Kabushiki Kaisha MariCar, which had used the trademark &#8220;MariCar&#8221;. The IP High Court deemed &#8220;MariCar&#8221; to be similar to Nintendo&#8217;s trademark &#8220;MARIO KART&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>\n<h3 class=\"line_ttl_02\">Conclusion<\/h3>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The Tokyo District Court did not accept infringement on foreign language websites, but The IP High Court did.\u00a0 The basis for this is Articles 2-1-1 and 2-1-2 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li>\n<h3 class=\"line_ttl_02\">Summary<\/h3>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The Tokyo District Court did not recognize infringement on foreign language websites, as they considered &#8220;MariCar&#8221; to be not well-known among foreigners.\u00a0 In contrast, The IP High Court deemed Nintendo&#8217;s &#8220;MARIO KART&#8221; to be famous and accepted the similarity between &#8220;MARIO KART&#8221; and the defendant&#8217;s trademark &#8220;MariCar.&#8221; \u00a0Additionally, it was deemed difficult to recognize the elimination of confusion even with a disclaimer.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>\n<h3 class=\"line_ttl_02\">My comments<\/h3>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The difference in judgment between the Tokyo District Court and The IP High Court lies in whether they recognized the use of foreign language websites as unfair competition.\u00a0 &#8220;MariCar&#8221; is well-known within Japan but not among foreigners.\u00a0 The IP High Court recognized the use of foreign language websites as unfair competition by comparing &#8220;MARIO KART&#8221; with the defendant&#8217;s trademark.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nintendo won a lawsuit against Kabushiki Kaisha MariCar, which had used the trademark &#8220;MariCar&#8221;. T &#8230; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bran-design.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1050"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bran-design.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bran-design.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bran-design.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bran-design.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1050"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/bran-design.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1050\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1055,"href":"https:\/\/bran-design.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1050\/revisions\/1055"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bran-design.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1050"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bran-design.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1050"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bran-design.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1050"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}