CASE STUDIES
CASE STUDIES
2019.01.20
Vol.13 (GRANREVE)
No. 2017-600038 (Advisory opi...
CASE STUDIES
2018.12.16
Vol.12 (MUSIC APARTMENT)
H28 (gyo-ke) 10191 (The deci...
CASE STUDIES
2018.12.09
Vol.11 (TAKAGI)
H29 (wa) 14637 Plaint...
CASE STUDIES
2018.10.17
Vol.10 (GUI FOR VIDEO GAME)
Appeal No. 2014-26812 ...
CASE STUDIES
2018.10.02
Vol.9 (MARI CAR)
According to Nintendo’s news r...
CASE STUDIES
2018.09.30
Vol.8 (RISO NO AOJIRU)
Opposition No. 2016-900164 ...
CASE STUDIES
2018.09.18
Vol.7 (PITAVA)
H26(WA)No.768 Infringement s...
CASE STUDIES
2018.09.09
Vol.6（OASIS）
Appeal No.2016-17962 Summ...
CASE STUDIES
2018.08.27
Vol.5 (ASAKURA)
Opposition No. 2017-900213 &n...
CASE STUDIES
2018.08.26
Vol.4 (VEGE PIZZA)
Appeal No. 2017-12405 Subject...
CASE STUDIES
2018.08.19
Vol.3 (MEDICAL MIND)
H28(WA)No.28591 Infringement...
CASE STUDIES
2018.07.31
Vol.2 (OMOTENASHI)
Invalidation No.2014-890062 ...
CATEGORY
NEW ENTRY
2026.07.31
【Radio Drama】Who Owns the ZOOM Trademark? — An original script_ゆるカワ商標ラジオ (Yurukawa TM Radio)＃2222024.12.23
ZOOM Trademark Dispute in Japan!2024.03.29
New Policy on Letters of Consent for Trademarks in Japan2023.07.01
Contents regarding IP (知財がテーマのコンテンツ)2023.05.10
MARIO KART (Nintendo) vs MariCar
info@bran-design.jp